1/7/2026AI Engineering

Beyond MCP Servers: Revolutionizing Agent Tooling

Beyond MCP Servers: Revolutionizing Agent Tooling

=====================================================

The Context Conundrum: Why MCP Servers Need an Alternative
——————————————————–

As we continue to push the boundaries of what’s possible with AI agents, one challenge remains persistently at the forefront: context management. The traditional approach to connecting agents to external tools via MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers has been instrumental, but it comes with a significant drawback – it consumes a large chunk of the agent’s context window. For instance, a relatively simple MCP server can eat up around 10,000 tokens, which is about 5% of the agent’s context window. Stack multiple MCP servers, and this can quickly escalate to 20% or more. The need for alternatives that maintain control while optimizing context usage has become imperative. For a deeper dive into the evolving landscape of AI and its impact on software development, check out our article on Revolutionizing Software Development with Agent Sandboxes: A Technical Deep Dive.

Exploring Alternatives to MCP Servers
————————————-

The quest for more efficient and controlled ways to connect agents to external tools has led to the development of three promising approaches: CLI (Command-Line Interface) based tooling, script-based tooling, and skills-based tooling. Each of these alternatives offers a unique set of benefits and trade-offs.

CLI-Based Tooling

The CLI approach involves teaching the agent how to use specific CLI commands to interact with external tools. This is achieved through a combination of context, model prompt, and tools. By summarizing the README and CLI documentation for a tool, the agent can understand how to utilize it effectively. The key advantage here is control – the developer has full control over what the agent can and cannot do. Moreover, this approach significantly reduces context consumption compared to MCP servers. For example, using a CLI-based approach can save around 4% of the context window.

Script-Based Tooling

Script-based tooling takes a similar approach to CLI but involves providing the agent with self-contained scripts that it can execute to perform specific tasks. This method leverages the concept of “progressive disclosure,” where the agent is given just enough information to perform a task without loading unnecessary context. By prompt-engineering the agent to understand when to use each script and not to read the scripts themselves unless necessary, context consumption can be drastically reduced – often to less than 1% of the original context window. This approach is reminiscent of techniques discussed in Building a Reusable Skill for Forking Terminal Windows: A Technical Deep Dive, where the focus is on efficient and targeted tool usage.

Skills-Based Tooling

Skills-based tooling, similar to script-based tooling, involves bundling scripts or CLI commands into a “skill” that the agent can invoke. The primary difference lies in how these skills are discovered and executed. Skills offer progressive disclosure and are particularly useful for complex tasks that require multiple steps or tools. By encapsulating the necessary scripts or commands within a skill directory, developers can provide agents with powerful, self-contained toolsets that minimize context usage.

Technical Analysis: Trade-offs and Limitations
———————————————

Each of the alternatives to MCP servers comes with its own set of trade-offs. MCP servers offer simplicity and a rich feature set but lack in terms of customizability and context efficiency. CLI-based tooling provides control and better context management but requires more upfront effort to set up. Script and skills-based tooling offer excellent context preservation and flexibility but can introduce complexity and potential code duplication.

  • MCP Servers: High simplicity, low customizability, and significant context consumption.
  • CLI-Based Tooling: Medium complexity, high customizability, and moderate context consumption.
  • Script/Skills-Based Tooling: Medium to high complexity, high customizability, and low context consumption.

The choice among these alternatives depends on the specific requirements of the project, including the need for control, context efficiency, and simplicity.

The Future of Agent Tooling: Evolution and Implications
——————————————————

As AI continues to advance, the importance of efficient, controlled, and flexible tooling for agents will only grow. The evolution of MCP servers and their alternatives will likely be shaped by the need for better context management, increased customizability, and seamless integration with a wide range of tools and services. For insights into the future of AI and its potential impact on various industries, explore our article on The Year of Trust: How Agentic Engineering is Revolutionizing Software Development.